The cartoon that Robert Crumb did in response to the barbaric attack on Charlie Hebdo was a not-so-gentle reminder that not everyone views Ralph Bakshi as a deity. Recently, Bakshi completed The Last Days of Coney Island, the film he funded on Kickstarter in 2013. Its premiere is bizarre: for $3.99, you can rent the 25-minute film for a week on Vimeo. At the present, the Kickstarter backers that made the film possible have been unable to view the film without coughing up an extra four bucks. To paraphrase one of the Kickstarter comments, a true New York hustler to the very end.
To his credit, though, Bakshi’s company has promised a free online streaming of the film for backers shortly. But, even if Coney Island isn’t much, why kill its chances of qualifying for awards by premiering it this way? It’s certainly confusing and chaotic, and that’s an apt description given the filmmaker in question.
I wrote about Bakshi at considerable length in Sick Little Monkeys, and my opinions haven’t changed. I love his first two movies, Fritz the Cat and Heavy Traffic, and his Mighty Mouse TV show is about as unwatchable as a historically significant work can get.
Coonskin was the beginning of the end—despite the brilliant character animation and choreography, there isn’t a single engaging character in that film—regardless of the famous controversy surrounding its release. Bakshi himself has retold the tale of its disastrous screening at the Museum of Modern Art in November 1974 innumerable times, but here’s an account from a different perspective.
Izzy Klein isn’t a figure that garners much praise, but he witnessed and participated in a lot of animation history (and created Mighty Mouse while working for Terrytoons). He was a generous fount of knowledge to historians and through his articles in Cartoonist Profiles. (Although as my friend Howard Beckerman commented, “Ever notice how the ink never spills on him?”) He also exchanged regular letters throughout the ’70s with Jim Carmichael, a former layout artist for Disney, Screen Gems and Hanna-Barbera who went on to edit Peg-Board, the union newsletter. That correspondence is now housed in Klein’s collection at Syracuse University.
A lot of it wasn’t terribly important for research on my book about New York animation in the Golden Age, but the gossip relayed is downright entertaining, with refreshingly human takes on figures immune to criticism these days. Klein and Carmichael gave each other weekly updates about the antics of “Bakflip” in New York and Hollywood during his period of relevance.
One of those updates described the infamous MOMA Coonskin screening, which Klein and his wife attended. Historian and author Jerry Beck was also there and confirmed the account’s accuracy.
(Transcribed from Klein’s typewritten original, typos and all.)
November 19, 1974
Have you heard about Bakshi and the preview screening of “COONSKIN”? at the Museum of Modern Art on November 12th? A CONFRONTATION OF BLACKS AND RALPH BAKSHI: a real thriller! It was a newsworthy happening, but not a goddaam word about it in the papers. A self censored Press or no reporters were present.
To get back to the beginning… Ann and I were informed of the screening some time in advance and we obtained tickets. The auditorium was packed right up to the rear wall. I understand that there was a large overflow that could not get in. We sat down way in front to be near where Ralph would be disbursing from the “mike” Looking over the assemblage I could not spot a single familiar face from our animation business. When Ralph Bakshi came in he sat down on an aisle seat not too far from us. We waved to each other… “Hello Ralph”..”Hello Is.”
Before the show started Bakshi was introduced to the people by a young lady from the Museum. Ralphy stood, walked to the mike and said only a few words which only amounted to greetings and happy to see you here. Then the screening started. “Coonskin” is live and animated. The animation is very well done. Most of the characters are black… or should I say folks. All humanized..though no credit to the human race. The story is based on the Uncle Remus tales.. Br’er Rabbit, Br’er Fox and Br’er Bear.. all blacks.. They come up from the South and invade Harlam. They take over the rackets from other blacks and from the Mafia (whites). The characters are all vile, profane, … whores, pimps, perverts criminals of the lowest order. The atmosphere is of a nightmare. The language is salted with profanities, the favorite expression is “mother-fucker”. Everyone was caricatured in the most extreme and ugly fashion.
(Of course you must allow that neither Ann nor I are admirers of the sordid views of life as dished out by Ralph Bakshi).
As the screening ended and the lights were turned up, there was some scattered hand-clapping… not much… but lots of booing. Then from the rear of the auditorium a group of blacks, young and well dressed, men and women marched down to where Ralph had placed himself at the mike. They shouted their objections to the picture as the came down the aisle. They surrounded Bakshi, took the microphone and expressed additional objections and observations….like.. “We don’t live in ghettos, we live in apartment houses.. only Jews in Russia and Poland live in ghettos” Ralph answered.. “Only about 15 percent of blacks live in nice home, the rest live in slums..” I must give Ralph credit, he stood right up to them.. He shouted: “You’ve copped out the Black revolution.” A black girl shouted back: “Who the hell picked you out to be our Messiah.”
There was lots more said.. one black man shouted as he approached Ralph: “Have you ever been in a black church and heard a preacher say ‘mother-fucker? How dare you misrepresent us. A well-groomed black, wearing a cashmere camels hair coat was the first to take over the mike, expressed himself: “If I have anything to say, Paramount will never distribute this picture.” Ralph: “This is not a Paramount release.” Ralph was also charged with making these dirty pictures to make money on. He denied that he had made money on any of his pictures.
As I said, there was much more said, but overall the blacks looked very menacing as if they were going to pounce on Bakshi any minute and stomp him down. One black man had a billy club in his fist and kept slapping it on the palm of his hand. During the uproar there were two or three white fellows with small cameras taking close shots of the black demonstrators. The black man who threatened that the picture would never be distributed hollered: “Take that goddamn camera off my face.” I don’t know if the camera fellows were only camera-buffs, or from the Museum (very likely) or from the press.
The audience was mostly white. There were no Bakshi defenders coming forward, which I think was a good thing.. it only could have developed into a messy situation. Also, judging from the lack of applause I’m inclined to think the crowd agreed with the blacks.
Finally Ralph moved away from the microphone and sat down in one of the front seats. The shouting had subsided and the audience was leaving the theatre at a very fast pace. A small crowd of people crowded around Bakshi, some were the people who had been sitting there right along during the show. I thought I should say something to Bakshi before leaving, so I elbowed through, I said “Excuse me .. this is a social visit..” Ralph looked up, his face looked strained and pale, he saw me, said, “Not now Is, I’m still shaking all over.”
As Ann and I were walking east towards our bus on Madison Avenue we became aware of some people walking behind us. One of them was saying: “The police should have come down in a flying-wedge formation and taken care of those demonstrators. And I turned to that person, said, “That’s no solution.”
Would you believe it, animated cartoons used to be a fun thing.
End of brief report.
Interesting article, definitely illustrates the hit or miss nature of the majority of Bakshi’s work
Speaking of Syracuse and “Coonskin”, I was there when they attempted to show the movie at the Huntington Beard Crouse Hall auditorium in 1975. It never made it to the first reel, as by the winter/spring of ’75 the movie’s reputation had proceeded it, and it was shouted down by the protesters who turned out (“We don’t want no Coonskin” was the main chant before those trying to show the movie gave up). By then, just the title alone was enough to stir up a protest no matter where the movie was screened.
Bakshi’s films came out during the period from about 1969 through ’76 when the lifting of the restrictions on the production code caused a lot of filmmakers to be like kids in a candy store, in using words and images they were blocked from using in the past. Ralph was one of those who luxuriated in the excess — he never could have done his trio of movies before 1968, but he might have been better off if he had done them a decade later, when the forbidden fruits were now old hat and he could have at least tried to make his films a little more restrained.
It’s no doubt that this film was one of the few he produced that could not find a distributor.
One main problem with Coonskin was that it came out too late, when the “blaxploitation” craze both died out of waning interest and social backlash. Had it been released around 1971, the attitude could have been different when the perspective still seemed fresh. Though fully animating it probably would have helped too.
While I agree with the “forbidden fruit” element, an inseparable part of late 60s-70s filmmaking that easily lends itself to excess, I thought those first efforts did very well in that element and more or less captured that era in a sort of animated phantasmagoria.
Though you do pose an interesting question: If Bakshi held off filmmaking for a decade, would he still have been as “big” as he was today? Would he had gone straight into rotoscoping, or passed that up altogether?
I’m going to be honest by saying that I consider Bakshi all over the map. In fact, I’d rather watch Coonskin and the ’87 Mighty Mouse over Trigun or Sita Sings the Blues any day of the week. (I found the former to be really dull, and the latter flat-out terrible.) However, I will agree that Heavy Traffic is considerably better than what came after.
I haven’t seen Last Days of Coney Island yet, but I like how Bakshi has been touting it as a significant new direction for animation when judging by the previews it seems to be a rehash of material and themes from his 70s movies. Kind of like how Cans Without Labels is more or less a remake of Man’s Best Friend.
Given what followed, a rehash of Heavy Traffic would be an improvement. I do hope they send out the Kickstarter screening out soon. As far as Cans Without Labels goes, does anyone honestly think that will ever be finished?
Bakshi gives great interviews, but his films rarely live up to his words.
Fritz the Cat is still my favorite Bakshi film, for a number of reasons: It tapped into the nostalgia about the \’60s while still highlighting the bad aspects of the era (racism; violent revolutionaries). It had a likable protagonist that I enjoy following from unconnected set piece to unconnected set piece, no easy feat for a character who is a poon hound. The animation was just wild enough without being hard to follow (hi, Cool World!). The music\’s a great mix of old-fashioned and contemporary. It has a great ending. Most importantly, it\’s one of the few Bakshi films to get honest laughs out of me, whereas most (at least the ones that attempt comedy) are more nervous titters.
Heavy Traffic is Bakshi\’s most personal film, and the first where he wasn\’t tied down to existing source material, but I didn\’t like it nearly as much as Fritz. Go figure.
About the article: Fascinating stuff. It goes without saying that due to today\’s even more volatile racial climate, Coonskin wouldn\’t have a chance in hell of being made.
Oh, Coonskin could get made, it just would have problems being shown, and a lot of the criticism would be nasty, just like it was back in the day.
Great account of the screening, very vivid.
If any of you commenting here knew how much current animators working in the industry want to make films like Heavy Traffic, Fritz The Cat, Coonskin, Wizards, The Lord Of The Rings, The Hobbit and American Pop look no further than the Cartoon Brew website, and most of the comments made after the Oscars air: you’ll see people admire Bakshi up the yingyang, and then some.
In fact, here’s some of the comments made about how animation’s perceived by average folk here in the USA:
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3787578420
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3771467686
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3772664836
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3772958712
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3773356721
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/cartoonbrewlive/will_isle_of_dogs_help_animation_be_viewed_as_a_serious_artform/#comment-3779214298
Will Wes Anderson’s ‘Isle of Dogs’ Help Animation Be Viewed As A Serious Artform?
Plus, there’s the commentary about the Oscars and how the people who run the site (and also comment on it) feel about Disney (and Pixar) winning the Best Animated Picture honor every year:
No Contest This Year: ‘Coco’ Has Emerged As Frontrunner For The Best Animated Feature Oscar