Author Archives: Thad

Somewhere in the universe, John Foster is roaring

mickey at 90 van beuren

Fan and film collector Kyle Ashby called attention to this howler in Life‘s Mickey at 90 special, now on newsstands everywhere.  The caption for the two photos reads: “After Steamboat Willie, Mickey Mouse went on to star in some 120 animated shorts, with Walt providing his voice until 1946. At left, an animator works on cels for a film. In addition to character voices, the film soundtracks included music captured in studio, shown here.”

Anyone with eyes can tell you that the photos depict not a cartoon with Mickey and Minnie Mouse, but Toy Time, a 1932 Aesop’s Fable from Van Beuren with Disney mice lookalikes. Because the resemblance was so strong, and because they appeared so often (and often bawdily), Walt Disney actually took Van Beuren to court to get the studio to cease and desist. The photos were part of a staged behind-the-scenes look at the New York studio done after the lawsuit, David Gerstein tells me. “The unspoken point being to show that the characters were now unclothed and looked less like Mickey than before,” he adds.

It’s embarrassing that what’s ostensibly an officially sanctioned puff magazine got something so horribly wrong—as if people like David and J.B. Kaufman, authors of a forthcoming $200 hardback history of Mickey Mouse (talk about a hard sale!) weren’t a message away to check something—but it’s just another example of the unnerving culture we live in, where it’s “cool” to not fact-check anything, and even cooler to promote that ignorance. Witness Jeff Ryan’s recent book A Mouse Divided: How Ub Iwerks Became Forgotten, and Walt Disney Became Uncle Walt, a piece of shit that will undoubtedly further cement further misinformation about Disney’s early history. (No link from me to Ryan’s book. Go find it yourself.)

The Gerstein-Kaufman Mickey book, to be published by Taschen, will be thoroughly accurate and uncover reams of new information, but it’ll also undoubtedly be hindered by the high price, so few beyond diehards will read it compared to the “woke” people reading Ryan’s or Life. This is why a lot of us “whiners” and “snobs” do what we do for animation history. If we don’t get it right, no one else will.

7 Comments

Filed under classic animation

Popeye’s “Partial Post” by Gene Deitch

Almost as a regressive follow-up to the last post about Boomerang posting all of the Famous Studios Popeye cartoons, I’m posting this: “Partial Post”, one of the King Features TV Popeye cartoons subcontracted to Gene Deitch. In it, Popeye battles a mailbox from outer space. I wish it lived up to the insanity promised by that descriptive sentence, but unfortunately it just lives up to the substandard of all the ’60s King Features TV cartoons.

Still, it’s been a perverted favorite of Popeye animation expert Bob Jaques, who’s had a black-and-white 16mm print for years. I was able to nab a low-fade color 16mm print for free recently because—why not? As Bob notes, a lot of the Popeye heads herein are copied straight off Johnny Gent’s classic model. Perhaps one day we’ll see all of the King Features Popeye cartoons dumped to DVD, but I’ll admit I haven’t even looked at my copy of the Warner Archive collection of all the cartoons subcontracted to Paramount. Can you blame me?

(Thanks to Tommy Stathes for the transfer.)

10 Comments

Filed under TV, wtf

The [Nearly] Complete Famous Popeye

When the streaming Boomerang service launched last year, I immediately subscribed because the idea of $40 a year for anywhere access to some 300+ classic uncensored Warner Bros. cartoons was one worth supporting. Unfortunately, the library of genuine classic cartoons didn’t increase with much frequency during those twelve months. The available Warner cartoons have remained largely the same, with hardly any from the pre-1948 library. The selection of Tom & Jerry cartoons was exhaustive, but limited to the “safe” cartoons (none with the maid); only a few random MGM Tex Avery cartoons (mostly with Droopy); not enough of the better Hanna-Barbera TV cartoons (they’re good background noise); Chuck Jones’ Horton Hears a Who! is presented in a bastardized widescreen version; and no Fleischer Popeye—which I guess is all to the good, lest they provide the horrendous colorized versions Ted Turner had done in the late ’80s.

I should hasten to say, though, that Boomerang certainly did provide more than enough content to justify a year’s subscription… 300+ uncut Warner cartoons is still nothing to sneeze at. Also worth noting is that the majority of the Warner cartoons that were presented in faux widescreen on DVD eight years ago are available in proper Academy ratio on the streaming app.

Alas, as my subscription is about to end, the folks at Boomerang decided to expand the selection of available color Famous Popeye cartoons to, well, just about the entire filmography. It’s quite shocking to see cartoons like The Island Fling (pictured below) and Popeye’s Pappy available completely uncensored with no historic context… so why no Pop-Pie Ala Mode?

Island FlingI enjoyed the opportunity to go through the series again, mostly because my opinion of it remains the same. The Famous Popeye cartoons are generally great through 1947 and remain watchable until 1950. If you’ve wanted the opportunity to revisit the dynamic, unmatchable animation of John Gentilella or see Jim Tyer birthing his iconic style, here’s your chance to do so with ease.

The remaining years, however, are all darkness—the Famous writers and directors showed remarkable skill at taking unfailingly likable Fleischer cartoons and turning them into taxing, ugly experiences. (The aforementioned Popeye’s Pappy is a remake of the immortal Goonland, and it makes the case succinctly enough through some pretty vile racial humor.)

What’s very clear from this rewatching is how badly these cartoons are in need of restoration. Most of the transfers used by Boomerang date back to the late ’80s, sourced from 35mm positive elements that had already faded salmon pink. I’ve seen what the cartoons are supposed to look like in Technicolor, mostly thanks to Steve Stanchfield and Mark Kausler. Once you see them with their full candy-like colors, you’ll understand why the series lasted so long even when it got so bad—Famous color styling was just invigorating when projected on a large screen. While it’s better to have some copy than no copy, and I certainly don’t fault Boomerang for using what was available (especially since they go out of their way to use the restored versions of other Warner and MGM cartoons), it still does a disservice when the color plays such a vital role in the filmmaking, especially in a good cartoon like W’ere on Our Way to Rio. Hopefully the restoration that’s been promised these cartoons for over a decade is just around the corner.

16 Comments

Filed under classic animation

Pecking Holes in Poles

woody posterThe oddest feature on the DVD of Woody Woodpecker, the newest live-action/CGI animation hybrid based on a classic cartoon character, is a hidden bonus feature: Niagara Fools, one of the better ’50s Woody Woodpecker cartoons, looking nicer here than it did on the 2008 Woody Woodpecker & Friends Classic Cartoon Collection Vol. 2. And it’s hidden well—no mention of it anywhere and no chapter stop—so I’m at a loss for its inexplicable inclusion. I say “better” because as most cartoon fans know, cartoons in the theatrical era didn’t get much worse than when the credits read “Directed by Paul J. Smith.” He presided over the last two decades of the Walter Lantz studio’s output and while there were occasional bright spots in the first few years, like Niagara Fools, Smith was an auteur of inept cartoon comedy and crude drawing and animation.

In that respect, Woody Woodpecker lives up to its source material very well. It’s no better or worse than what you’d expect by now in a world that’s birthed Looney Tunes: Back in ActionYogi BearAlvin and the Chipmunks, and whatever other “reprisals” I’m forgetting. You have the paint-by-numbers plot (Woody’s forest faces demolition; the new kid is having trouble with his dad; villains kidnap Woody and his new friends); the bland human leads (although one of the film’s villains, a poacher, is a dead-ringer for Dapper Denver Dooley); and the smattering of fart and shit gags. (As the Chipmunks movie established, coprophagia is now an accepted staple of children’s entertainment. In one scene, Woody defecates on a villain’s ice cream cone, which apparently makes it tastier. It’s the second time Woody shits in the movie.)

The CG animation, done by Cinemotion in Bulgaria, is serviceable even if it’s inappropriate for as manic and elastic a character as the woodpecker to be anything but hand-drawn animated. Woody does at least maintain his anarchic/amoral personality for most of the picture, causing everything from construction site mishaps to gas explosions, which does wear thin over some 80 minutes. If there’s anything redeemable about the movie, it’s that voice actor Eric Bauza did an excellent job recreating the circa ’40s Woody. Pity he wasn’t in every minute of it.

The choice of director Alex Zamm (Inspector Gadget 2Beverly Hills Chihuahua 2) is proof enough that Universal execs had no intention of this being anything more than forgettable cookie-cutter filler for the Wal-Mart and Netflix family sections after it was released in the film’s intended market of Brazil. There, Woody (as “Pica-Pau”) has remained incredibly popular with all ages, and still broadcasts daily, something that obviously can’t be said for the character’s home country. Why intentionally craft a formulaic babysitter movie for a market where the original Woody cartoons are still popular with teens and adults? It’s a missed opportunity, and film reviewers in Brazil have noticed, as exhibited here and here.

Paul Smith fortunately wasn’t the only guy to handle the character. Many fine Woody cartoons came from Shamus Culhane, Dick Lundy, and Don Patterson, as did some great comics from John Stanley, Dan Gormley, and Freddy Milton. Unlike Mighty Mouse or Casper the Friendly Ghost (characters nobody honestly likes but have still been around and known forever), there are real gems to be found in the Woody series and the Lantz cartunes in general (I should know, I co-ran a website devoted to them for many years) and that has inevitably helped the cartoons’ longevity in Brazil. Ergo, a new movie with Woody should celebrate and pay homage to what people liked about the old cartoons—right? Apparently not.

It’s not as though the people that could do the job are hard to reach. Woody Woodpecker gives a “special thanks” credit to David Feiss (Ren & StimpyCow & ChickenI Am Weasel), whose highly recognizable frenetic style would’ve been a perfect match for the character, but there’s no sign of his influence here. Not that the right people being there would’ve probably made a difference. The last reprisal of the Lantz characters in 1998, The New Woody Woodpecker Show, was headed by Ren & Stimpy‘s Bob Jaques in its first season and staffed with many of the talented and distinctive artists from the Nickelodeon series. Yet it was still as unwatchable as anything else on TV (getting progressively worse in the former R&S artists’ absence, of course). It’s obvious the badness of these reprisals all comes down to control from the top, regardless of who’s making the product. It doesn’t matter who does Woody any more than it matters who does Bugs (see Joe Dante’s interviews regarding Looney Tunes: Back in Action), unless these guys are allowed to do what they do best.

After decades of this behavior, and with our culture immersed in reboots of all shapes and sizes, the time is ripe for improvement—let talented people rebirth these things the way fans want to see them; chances are, they’re fans too, so they’ll know. Disney seems to have struck a chord with its DuckTales revival; Tom and Jerry are reused by Warners so many times a year they’re bound to hit a target occasionally. But that’s about it. With the news that Animaniacs! is being revived with an ex-Seth MacFarlane producer as the showrunner and without a single writer from the original show, it seems most of Hollywood is determined to remain set in its alienating ways. It’s a shame even from a financial perspective; even $21 a day once a month is better than a billion dollar boner.

10 Comments

Filed under classic animation, crap, Ren & Stimpy, TV