Category Archives: comics

The Single Worst Thing Carl Barks Ever Drew

(Thinking hard why this deserves attention, but I’m doing it anyway.)

A few years ago, I went with David Gerstein to a Barks exhibit at Geppi’s Entertainment Museum in Baltimore. I had a smile on my face the whole time looking at Barks’s paintings, awash in happy memories of plowing through Gladstone back issues searching for whichever of his stories were new to me. But then I saw the above drawing. I think David and I were equally appalled, but it was I who gave this colored pencil sketch of Daisy Duck the honorable distinction as the single worst thing Carl Barks ever drew.

How is it possible that this is the legitimate work of the Good Duck Artist? (My friend Robertryan Cory asked, “Did he draw this after he died? Because that’d explain some of the problems with it.”) Mssr. Gerstein had an answer ready…

Barks’ mid-1990s managers—whom he later fired—contracted for him to crank out a series of around 100 colored-pencil limited editions in only a couple of months.

Many were variations on strangely chosen themes picked by someone other than Carl (so there are around ten treatments apiece of Donald riding a dolphin, Scrooge losing cash stored in his hat, Donald and Daisy dancing on stage…)

Barks had to produce them faster than he’d have liked, and quite a lot of ugly ducks resulted…

Thanks, Dave…

1 Comment

Filed under carl barks, comics

Al Capp: A Life to the Contrary

Being one of the most original and influential visionaries of all-time has nothing to do with being a decent human being. A harsh truth anyone interested in the arts has to accept straightaway. And in the entire history of cartooning, no one quite illustrates this principle like Al Capp.

The short version: Li’l Abner had no equal in the medium of comic strips in its 1.5 decade prime (arbitrarily beginning any year in the latter half of the ’30s and ending in the early ’50s) and the man rose to the status of celebrity like no other cartoonist of that era. The strip’s biting narrative and rich draftsmanship had a major impact on Walt Kelly, Harvey Kurtzman, Charles Schulz, and any print cartooning visionary to emerge after its creation. Only Kelly’s Pogo managed to match (and, arguably, surpass) Capp’s Dickensian-like skill of enhancing the mundane, creating compelling characters out of even the incidentals. Whereas Kelly’s own sympathies were always with his characters, Capp held his characters in open contempt; the joy Capp got out of his self-aware style was exposing what unlikable, disdainful creatures every single one of his creations were.

Unfortunately, that cynical bile, as it so often is with the best talents, was inseparable from the work and the actual person. Capp’s gift for storytelling expanded to his personal and professional life, and he often spun fabricated stories that would be funnier if they weren’t at the personal expense of so many other people in a less than opportune position to defend themselves. His early losses, both physically (he lost his leg in a streetcar accident when he was nine) and creatively (he never finished art school and Joe Palooka’s Ham Fisher severly mistreated him), only fueled his abusive nature rather than enlighten him.

He was abusive to his friends, business partners, collaborators,and family; a misogynist who mistreated his wife and lovers with equal disdain; and, to borrow from Mark Evanier, a serial rapist whose third-leg antics (which victimized everyone from the nameless to Grace Kelly, Edie Adams, and Goldie Hawn) were defended by no less than Richard Nixon. If there is a positive side to this grisly story, it’s that Capp undoubtedly did feel remorse and disgust for the pain he caused. Suffice to say, it’s a dark, tragic, and, at times, humorous story worth telling with utmost delicacy.

Michael Schumacher is no stranger to chronicling the life of a widely influential cartoonist, and no one has done more to champion Al Capp’s Li’l Abner than Denis Kitchen has with his excellent reprint collections. As a team, they’re more than qualified to chronicle the life of the man behind Dogpatch, and Al Capp: A Life to the Contrary more than meets the goal of being a standard biography. If you are worried that aspects of the man Capp will be whitewashed, don’t be. This is the whole bitter story.

Some of the book’s chronology jumps around a bit much for a biography (the authors talk about the latter half of the ’40s in one section, and then discuss World War II in the next), and an analysis of why exactly Li’l Abner is the comic masterwork that it is, rather than simply stating that it is, would have been welcome. But given the scope of this book, and the gripping life story they have to tell in some 260 pages, they are admirably thorough and pull no punches. This is the biography David Michaelis wishes he wrote, one that doesn’t require penning a fantasy version as his atrocity Schulz and Peanuts did.

Do not base your opinion of Al Capp on that isolated YouTube clip of his encounter with John Lennon and Yoko Ono that is constantly making its rounds in social media. Schumacher and Kitchen have presented the real Al Capp here in their pageturner: admirably creative, but there’s not much to admire otherwise. Though in all fairness, that clip does rather accurately depict why anyone today can hear a Beatles song and know exactly what it is, but remain dumbfounded if they actually encounter a Li’l Abner strip. Sad, ain’t it?

1 Comment

Filed under comics, dead guys, people

Milton Knight’s The Lady in Question!

I’ve had absolutely engaging conversations with artists whose work I’d quite like to forget. Then there are those whose work I’ve always admired (and always will) whom I wish I never had a dialogue with at all. The cartoonist and animator Milton Knight fits neither category. I always learn a great deal from my chats with him and from looking at his art – and furthermore, I always enjoy it.

Knight is the last of the rare, nearly extinct of breed of New York cartoonists, a heritage that includes Otto Messmer, Jim Tyer, and Ralph Bakshi. A magnificent sense of chaos underlies the work of the best New York talent, and it’s scared off a large percentage of animation historians and students who prefer and champion the cushier (and often fake) Hollywood cartoon. That raw energy comes not from personal eccentricities but a rare gift that enables an artist to exploit the harsh environment he lives and works in and channel that energy in his art in spades. Rarely did the New York guys get the chances they deserved. Messmer toiled away brilliantly in repellent conditions and even today has his contributions marginalized by supporters of his convicted rapist boss [Pat Sullivan]. Tyer was despised on principle by the west coast (specifically Disney’s) and often worked on directionless product beneath his skill to support his family. And Bakshi, well…

Knight is an avid student of the medium’s history and in the elite class that knows more about New Yawk studios and personnel than anyone else, so much so that he can tell who drew/animated what in just about any Terrytoon. He uses his skill and knowledge to take the best aspects of that frenetic, neglected class of the cartooning world and gels it into his own personal visual feast for the eyes in his new digital comic Hugo: “The Lady in Question!” The story turns what might have been a token Fleischer experience into a truly twisted yarn. The staging is busy but never cluttered, and the inking is phenomenal. (The material gets raw, though in this day and age, in which the filthiest pornography is easier to get than taking out the trash, it’s nothing you’ve never seen before.)

It’s first-rate cartooning that I heartily recommend, and available at the low price of five bucks. You can order it directly from Milton at his website.

8 Comments

Filed under comics, people

Marvel Comics: The Untold Story

Given everything that’s been going on with my own book (now available on Kindle!), it’s been hard to keep up on all the other great books that have come out, so I didn’t get around to this until now.

I have to make a confession upfront: I never liked superhero comics, and I still really don’t. Some might say that I developed my aversion to them because my father was (and still is) a devoted fan, but my attraction to guys like Carl Barks, John Stanley, Walt Kelly, and Sheldon Mayer just seemed a far more natural fit for my budding tastes, and they still do. In the last few years, though, I’ve relented, and now have utmost appreciation for the works of Jack Kirby and Jack Cole in particular. Truth be told, the ratio of gold to crap in funnybooks is about the same as superheroes (though on very different scales).

Having said that, Sean Howe’s book absolutely wowed me, and given the subject is largely about books I have zero interest in, that’s saying something. It’s the story of a company that took itself way too seriously, whose stories and characters became so convoluted and involved that the only way to save themselves was to make their universe even further convoluted. The backstabbing of its most important creators perfectly illustrates the grim fact that anyone in any business is expendable. The reasons for why Marvel, who have just as captivating a cast of characters as DC, couldn’t get any feature films off the ground until fairly recently are rife in typical Hollywood drama (is there any other kind?). The tale of the development of Stan Lee, from an eager kid whose dialogue was always sort of lackluster but was likable and talented enough to the resigned corporate mascot of today, is more engrossing than any other account I’ve read on the subject.

The biggest flaw is that the other creators (save Stan Lee) get far too little attention at the expense of the suits and editors. The most colorful pages are those discussing Jack Kirby’s work and his personal struggles with the company. Fewer people in American pop culture are as compelling figures as Kirby, and while going on too many tangents about him might prove detrimental to the general history of Marvel, there was still no other artist the company was as indebted to as Kirby. Glimmers of eccentric egomaniacs (Frank Miller, Todd McFarlane) are also extremely entertaining, and I would have preferred more coverage of them than the constant refrains of the internal struggles at the top of the company.

Anyone with even a passing interest in the entertainment world should pick up this highly charged tome of the ‘little company that could’ turned corporate behemoth. Dare I say it, it’s more engaging than any comic.

Comic and animation artist Bob Camp’s 1983 two-page spread of the Marvel Bullpen.

3 Comments

Filed under comics, dead guys, people